Wallet profile
Analyzing wallet history…
Ownership
A provisional compression of the evidence on this profile, not a trust decision.
Risk: Risk clear — score summarizes available evidence.
Evidence before score — inspect what this wallet actually did.
Why this score?Score breakdown by dimension lives with the evidence it compresses.
View score breakdownObjective historical information — observations, not trust judgments.
Exceeds the indexed query limit.
Distinct UTC days with at least one indexed transaction.
Distinct calendar months with indexed activity (UTC).
Needs a transaction count and at least one active day from a complete walk.
First seen on Fathom: Sep 21, 2026 · ingestion metadata, not first activity.
Patterns that may need inspection — not verdicts.
Supporting evidence — never reputation on its own. Disputes are claims, not verdicts.
227 days since earliest indexed transaction
Fathom claims this wallet has a known on-chain age, measured from its earliest indexed transaction.
Age is the whole-day difference between today and the earliest first-transaction timestamp from indexed history. If no first transaction is indexed, no wallet_age proof is emitted.
Connect your wallet to inspect your own public profile — checking never requires claiming it.
106 / 1000 · No tier — partial · Evidence still being indexed
Context behind the global Fathom Score — not a trust decision.
Fathom Score → Dimensions → Evidence
Wallet age, direct transactions, and indexed native volume.
Evidence behind this (1)+31 more counterparties not shown — see stats below.
Transaction walk hit the indexed query limit, so this graph is a lower bound — not the full picture.
Evidence that may require further inspection.
These signals describe observed patterns in indexed data. They are not proof of wrongdoing and do not determine whether a wallet should be trusted. Risk is kept separate from reputation: reputation shows what history and relationships exist; risk flags patterns worth a second look.
No risk signals detected
The currently evaluated rules did not identify any risk pattern in the indexed evidence. This does not mean the wallet is guaranteed safe. 7 signals could not be evaluated because required data is unavailable — see below.
No product rule defines what counts as abnormal. Will be supplied by Spec 05 detection rule.
No structured evidence for this signal.
Wallet age or activity is above the fresh threshold (30 days / 10 transactions).
On-chain vouch edges indexed from the Fathom registry (Spec 08). A vouch is economic-backing evidence — it never creates reputation score on its own, and reciprocal vouches are recorded, not hidden.
Registry indexed through block 125274371 · status: ok
A vouch is economic-backing evidence: you stake native assets (or the configured ERC20 token) behind this wallet. It never creates reputation on its own.
Structured, signed claims from other wallets. Attestations are supporting evidence — they never replace on-chain behavior, and they do not create reputation on their own.
Connect your wallet to attest to this profile. Attestations are pseudonymous supporting evidence — they never replace on-chain behavior, and they do not create reputation on their own.
Signed reports filed against this wallet. A dispute is a claim, not proof of wrongdoing — it never changes reputation or risk here. On-chain disputes resolve through the registry lifecycle (open → disputed → upheld/dismissed).
A dispute is a signed report, not proof of wrongdoing. It does not change reputation or risk here. Connect your wallet to file one.
source: blockscout · method: derived · confidence: 0.7 (static per method — a deeper reference does not raise confidence)
Earliest indexed transaction: Feb 11, 2026.
Representative supporting transaction: open transaction — it supports the age claim but is not proven to be the first transaction.
Evaluable risk checks found no detected signal; no bonus is given.
Fathom does not treat one number as absolute truth. The score is a provisional compression of multiple evidence categories.
An overview only — this section assigns no percentages. Inspect the evidence below to see what drives the score.
Each proof records what is asserted, its source, and how to inspect it. Proofs are evidence — they never contain a reputation score. Fathom shows only what indexed data supports.
Proof references point to raw evidence. Where a transaction hash is indexed, a proof links to that transaction; otherwise it falls back to the wallet's explorer page (address-level evidence). We never fabricate a reference that is not backed by indexed data.
227 days since earliest indexed transaction
Fathom claims this wallet has a known on-chain age, measured from its earliest indexed transaction.
Age is the whole-day difference between today and the earliest first-transaction timestamp from indexed history. If no first transaction is indexed, no wallet_age proof is emitted.
source: blockscout · method: derived · confidence: 0.7 (static per method — a deeper reference does not raise confidence)
Earliest indexed transaction: Feb 11, 2026.
Representative supporting transaction: open transaction — it supports the age claim but is not proven to be the first transaction.
This profile is built from evidence, not from a single number. Each layer points at the one above it, so every claim can be traced back to raw on-chain data:
Wallet → Onchain History → Proofs → Evidence → Trust Decision
Each proof above names its source, verification method, and the explorer evidence it was derived from. A reputation score may eventually act as a compression layer over this evidence, but it is intentionally deferred until the scoring inputs are concrete. The trust decision stays yours.
Transaction walk hit the indexed query limit, so these counts are lower bounds — not exact totals.
Transaction walk is incomplete, so relationships are lower bounds. Will be supplied by a deeper indexed walk.
No structured evidence for this signal.
Transaction walk is incomplete, so relationships are lower bounds. Will be supplied by a deeper indexed walk.
No structured evidence for this signal.
Transaction walk is incomplete, so relationships are lower bounds. Will be supplied by a deeper indexed walk.
No structured evidence for this signal.
Too few active vouches to judge clustering. Will be supplied by more indexed vouch edges.
No structured evidence for this signal.
No active disputes (0 total).
No flagged-address source exists yet. Will be supplied by external flagged-address registry.
No structured evidence for this signal.
No malicious-contract source exists yet. Will be supplied by curated malicious-contract registry.
No structured evidence for this signal.